Lessons

What Happened When Finland Tested a Basic Income?

AdvancedSociety & Environment

英文簡報的示範講稿與中文翻譯。每一頁都可以聽示範、開口練習。

What Happened When Finland Tested a Basic Income?

A real experiment

1 / 8

Model script

Good evening, everyone. Imagine receiving a fixed amount of money every month from the government, with no conditions. It sounds like a dream, or maybe a bad idea. Finland actually tested it. Today, I'll explain the idea and what happened.

Your recording

Say this slide out loud, then listen to yourself.

Recordings stay on this device and disappear when you leave the page.

Useful phrases

  • Imagine receiving

    Picture yourself getting.

  • with no conditions

    Without any rules you must follow.

Full script

Read the whole talk.

All slides in one place. Read it through once, then practice slide by slide.

  1. 01What Happened When Finland Tested a Basic Income?

    Good evening, everyone. Imagine receiving a fixed amount of money every month from the government, with no conditions. It sounds like a dream, or maybe a bad idea. Finland actually tested it. Today, I'll explain the idea and what happened.

    大家晚安。想像一下,每個月都能從政府那裡領到一筆固定的錢,而且沒有任何條件。這聽起來像是美夢,也可能是個爛主意。芬蘭真的實驗過了。今天,我要說明這個概念,以及結果如何。

  2. 02What Is a Basic Income?

    A basic income is a regular payment that people receive without conditions. Unlike some unemployment benefits, people can keep it even if they find a job.

    基本收入是一種無條件、定期發給人民的錢。和某些失業給付不同,就算找到工作,也可以繼續領。

  3. 03The Finnish Experiment

    From 2017 to 2018, Finland ran an experiment. Two thousand unemployed people, aged twenty-five to fifty-eight, received five hundred sixty euros every month, with no conditions. Their results were compared with a control group that didn't receive it.

    從2017年到2018年,芬蘭進行了一項實驗。兩千名二十五歲到五十八歲的失業者,每個月無條件領取五百六十歐元。研究人員把他們的結果,和沒有領取的對照組做比較。

    Source: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (Finland) and Kela, results of the basic income experiment 2017–2018

  4. 04Result 1: Small Effect on Jobs

    So, did people work more? The effect on employment was small. The people who received the basic income worked slightly more days than the control group, but the difference was modest.

    那麼,大家有工作得比較多嗎?對就業的影響很小。領基本收入的人,工作天數比對照組多了一點,但差距並不大。

    Source: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (Finland), "Results of the basic income experiment: small employment effects, better perceived economic security and mental wellbeing"

  5. 05Result 2: Better Wellbeing

    The bigger difference was wellbeing. Recipients said they were more satisfied with their lives and felt less mental strain, sadness, and loneliness. They also felt more secure about their finances.

    比較大的差別在於幸福感。領取者表示,他們對生活更滿意,心理壓力、憂傷和孤單感也比較少。他們對自己的經濟狀況也比較有安全感。

    Source: Ministry of Social Affairs and Health (Finland), "Results of the basic income experiment: small employment effects, better perceived economic security and mental wellbeing"

  6. 06What It Doesn't Prove

    But we should be careful. The experiment included only unemployed people, lasted only two years, and was not a full national program paid for by taxes. So it can't tell us exactly what would happen if a whole country adopted basic income.

    不過我們要小心。這項實驗只包括失業者,只進行了兩年,而且不是由稅收支應的完整全國性計畫。所以,它沒辦法準確告訴我們,如果整個國家實施基本收入會發生什麼事。

  7. 07Why It Still Matters

    Still, it matters. Instead of only arguing about theory, Finland collected real data. Its results raise an important question: should we judge social policy only by jobs, or also by how people feel?

    即使如此,它還是很重要。芬蘭沒有只停留在理論爭辯,而是收集了真實的數據。它的結果帶出一個重要的問題:我們評估社會政策時,只看就業就好,還是也要看人們的感受?

  8. 08Conclusion

    To sum up, Finland's experiment showed small effects on employment but clear improvements in wellbeing. It didn't settle the debate, but it gave us real evidence to discuss. Thank you.

    總結來說,芬蘭的實驗顯示,對就業的影響很小,但幸福感有明顯的改善。它沒有為這場辯論畫下句點,卻給了我們可以討論的真實證據。謝謝大家。

Cover photo by tap5a on Pixabay